<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Firefox and Madame Tussauds Wax Museum and  free user testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2006/10/31/firefox-and-madame-tussauds-wax-museum-and-free-user-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2006/10/31/firefox-and-madame-tussauds-wax-museum-and-free-user-testing/</link>
	<description>LunaMetric's blog on conversion rate and web analytics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:51:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Waisberg</title>
		<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2006/10/31/firefox-and-madame-tussauds-wax-museum-and-free-user-testing/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Waisberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.22.16.69/blog/?p=214#comment-203</guid>
		<description>Great post, there are so many websites that are not built for Firefox, it's just amazing!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;I just read an interesting article about how Google started to thank people who find security flaws in their products by name in Google's corporate website. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Google thanks bug hunters: http://tinyurl.com/ykx3g8&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;It seems that Google is ready to admit they make mistakes. In fact, a few weeks ago I read a very interesting story about Google that shows how they believe that a company that does not make mistakes does not move fast enough.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;As sir Ken Robinson said in his presentation at TED (http://tinyurl.com/g3t7z), "those people that do not accept their mistakes, will never come up with an innovative solution to go out of that."&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Daniel Waisberg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post, there are so many websites that are not built for Firefox, it&#8217;s just amazing!</p>
<p>I just read an interesting article about how Google started to thank people who find security flaws in their products by name in Google&#8217;s corporate website. </p>
<p>Google thanks bug hunters: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ykx3g8" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ykx3g8</a></p>
<p>It seems that Google is ready to admit they make mistakes. In fact, a few weeks ago I read a very interesting story about Google that shows how they believe that a company that does not make mistakes does not move fast enough.</p>
<p>As sir Ken Robinson said in his presentation at TED (http://tinyurl.com/g3t7z), &#8220;those people that do not accept their mistakes, will never come up with an innovative solution to go out of that.&#8221;</p>
<p>Daniel Waisberg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2006/10/31/firefox-and-madame-tussauds-wax-museum-and-free-user-testing/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.22.16.69/blog/?p=214#comment-204</guid>
		<description>I think the key here is that some people can't or won't accept that things change.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;What was true "All our users use MSIE" may not be any more. "Some of our users use Firefox". Tomorrow it could just as easily be "80% of our users use the RobbinsFox Browser".&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;For us in the analytics game, it's too easy a trap to assume that what was yesterday will be tomorrow. We should *always* be re-evaluating and verifying our assumptions. And I'm just as guilty of not doing that as the next person.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Oh yeah. I work with one site that does 10's of millions of page views a month, and MSIE is way less than 10% usage.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Know your audience!&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;It's also possible that Madame T's simply don't have the resources to fix the problem for FFox either. Seen that one a few times. Not won't. Can't.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;Cheers!&lt;BR/&gt;- Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the key here is that some people can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t accept that things change.</p>
<p>What was true &#8220;All our users use MSIE&#8221; may not be any more. &#8220;Some of our users use Firefox&#8221;. Tomorrow it could just as easily be &#8220;80% of our users use the RobbinsFox Browser&#8221;.</p>
<p>For us in the analytics game, it&#8217;s too easy a trap to assume that what was yesterday will be tomorrow. We should *always* be re-evaluating and verifying our assumptions. And I&#8217;m just as guilty of not doing that as the next person.</p>
<p>Oh yeah. I work with one site that does 10&#8217;s of millions of page views a month, and MSIE is way less than 10% usage.</p>
<p>Know your audience!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also possible that Madame T&#8217;s simply don&#8217;t have the resources to fix the problem for FFox either. Seen that one a few times. Not won&#8217;t. Can&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Cheers!<br />- Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
