<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Negative Exact Match</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2006/12/11/my-negative-exact-match/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2006/12/11/my-negative-exact-match/</link>
	<description>Traffic, Analysis, Action</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:06:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robbin</title>
		<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2006/12/11/my-negative-exact-match/comment-page-1/#comment-467</link>
		<dc:creator>Robbin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 23:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.22.16.69/blog/?p=229#comment-467</guid>
		<description>Hi Greg. There really is a (small) follow-up to this: http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2007/01/04/negative-exact-match-part-ii/

As far as anything besides the GA-Experts hack: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.roirevolution.com/blog/2007/04/exact_keyword_tracking_with_google_analytics_revis.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ROI Revolution wrote a hack that you can use.&lt;/a&gt;  It is supposed to be great. But the problem is, it uses up your one user defined variable. I usually need that for something else, so I have to be in a situation where we are doing the AdWords and the Analytics/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Greg. There really is a (small) follow-up to this: <a href="http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2007/01/04/negative-exact-match-part-ii/" rel="nofollow">http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2007/01/04/negative-exact-match-part-ii/</a></p>
<p>As far as anything besides the GA-Experts hack: <a href="http://www.roirevolution.com/blog/2007/04/exact_keyword_tracking_with_google_analytics_revis.html" rel="nofollow">ROI Revolution wrote a hack that you can use.</a>  It is supposed to be great. But the problem is, it uses up your one user defined variable. I usually need that for something else, so I have to be in a situation where we are doing the AdWords and the Analytics/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Moore</title>
		<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2006/12/11/my-negative-exact-match/comment-page-1/#comment-466</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Moore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jul 2007 18:09:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://72.22.16.69/blog/?p=229#comment-466</guid>
		<description>Robin, this is so cool.  It makes sense that one-word Google search queries often don&#039;t convert well.  Negative exact match takes care of that.  So now you have me thinking about negative phrase match.

Any updates on this article?  One question I have is, you mentioned that when you bid on one-word keywords in broad match, the multi-word user queries that match it convert better than the single word user queries.  I&#039;m wondering how you like to find this information about user queries that trigger your ads.

I&#039;ve only used that Google query report.  Have you tried anything else you like?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robin, this is so cool.  It makes sense that one-word Google search queries often don&#8217;t convert well.  Negative exact match takes care of that.  So now you have me thinking about negative phrase match.</p>
<p>Any updates on this article?  One question I have is, you mentioned that when you bid on one-word keywords in broad match, the multi-word user queries that match it convert better than the single word user queries.  I&#8217;m wondering how you like to find this information about user queries that trigger your ads.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve only used that Google query report.  Have you tried anything else you like?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

