<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Social Media and Conversion â€“ Whatâ€™s the Deal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2008/01/08/social-media-and-conversion-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2008/01/08/social-media-and-conversion-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/</link>
	<description>LunaMetric's blog on conversion rate and web analytics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:17:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Taylor Pratt</title>
		<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2008/01/08/social-media-and-conversion-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/#comment-1102</link>
		<dc:creator>Taylor Pratt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 14:32:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2008/01/08/social-media-and-conversion-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/#comment-1102</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the comment Jim. I have also seen fascinating results from Stumbleupon traffic (it's my favorite social media website). I think what makes Stumbleupon traffic convert so well is that the tags you add to it will help bring in more targeted traffic. It is usually much better traffic then Digg.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the comment Jim. I have also seen fascinating results from Stumbleupon traffic (it&#8217;s my favorite social media website). I think what makes Stumbleupon traffic convert so well is that the tags you add to it will help bring in more targeted traffic. It is usually much better traffic then Digg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Tobin at Ignite Social Media</title>
		<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2008/01/08/social-media-and-conversion-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/#comment-1098</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Tobin at Ignite Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 22:29:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2008/01/08/social-media-and-conversion-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/#comment-1098</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting perspective. Sometimes this social media traffic is surprisingly strong (our traffic from Stumble Upon has a lower bounce rate than our average traffic, which shocked me).  But when it's surprisingly weak, you make an excellent, excellent point...

Thanks for the post.

~Jim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting perspective. Sometimes this social media traffic is surprisingly strong (our traffic from Stumble Upon has a lower bounce rate than our average traffic, which shocked me).  But when it&#8217;s surprisingly weak, you make an excellent, excellent point&#8230;</p>
<p>Thanks for the post.</p>
<p>~Jim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Green</title>
		<link>http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2008/01/08/social-media-and-conversion-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/#comment-1089</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 18:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2008/01/08/social-media-and-conversion-%e2%80%93-what%e2%80%99s-the-deal/#comment-1089</guid>
		<description>It would also be interesting to set up a profile with a filter that ONLY includes traffic from social media.  (Digg, StumbleUpon, Sphinn, etc...)  Then, you'd have a clean way to see exactly how those visitors interact with your site.  Maybe you could optimize your site for the best of both worlds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would also be interesting to set up a profile with a filter that ONLY includes traffic from social media.  (Digg, StumbleUpon, Sphinn, etc&#8230;)  Then, you&#8217;d have a clean way to see exactly how those visitors interact with your site.  Maybe you could optimize your site for the best of both worlds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
