GA Campaign Tracking Parameters: What's Really Required?

Posted on September 3, 2009 by Jonathan

Google Analytics campaign tracking is great, and we’ve talked about it lots before. The official story with the campaign tracking parameters is that Campaign, Source, and Medium (utm_campaign, utm_source, utm_medium) are all required. It says so in the the URL builder tool, for example.

I wondered though, what would happen if you left one or two of these off? Would campaign tracking still work?

The short answer is: As long as you include a source (utm_source), campaign parameters still work.

If the URL has the utm_source parameter, cookies get set correctly. If it has one of the other parameters but no utm_source, the cookies about where a visitor came from don’t get re-set at all (similar to using utm_nooverride=1).

What does it look like in reports? If you leave off either utm_medium or utm_campaign, you just get “(not set)” as the value for those fields (shown here in the All Traffic Sources and Campaign reports):

medium-campaign

Although I still recommend using all three fields for campaign tracking, this does have one take-home lesson: If you have situations in which URLs might get cut off (such as a plain-text email), always put the source first. This will help ensure you’ll at least get some data even if the other parameters are lopped off.

Share and Enjoy:

by Jonathan | Categories: Conversion Science

5 Responses to “GA Campaign Tracking Parameters: What's Really Required?”

pavel jašek says:

September 3, 2009 at 10:32 am

Hello Jonathan,

in “Helpful information” section GA URL Builder tool does not say that the utm_campaign is required. But I try to use it always.

On Twitter you say “Always set up utm_medium before campaign and source”, here I see “always put the source first”. So what order of UTM parameters do you prefer?
A) 1. source 2. medium 3. campaign
B) 1. medium 2. source 3. campaign

Do you see any difference in that despite the situation when URLs can get cut off?

Thanks
Pavel

Jonathan says:

September 3, 2009 at 10:40 am

That was a little mis-tweet. We followed up with a tweet saying “source” instead.

Always put source first. It’s the most important one, and if it’s missing, the other parameters just get ignored.

pavel jašek says:

September 3, 2009 at 10:44 am

OK, I just clicked from @jonnylongden’s retweet that used the medium