Upcoming LunaMetrics Events
San Francisco, Apr 28-30 Los Angeles, May 12-16 New York City, May 19-23 Chicago, Jun 16-18

The Negatives of Google’s Changes to AdWords Location Targeting





Over the years there have been both complaints and praises about Google’s approach to geo-targeting: while it provides advertisers with the ability to further refine their campaigns to increase conversion rates and other metrics, there were (and are) still a few things missing that AdWords marketers have been wishing for; unfortunately, Google’s recent update to its location targeting tool didn’t solve these issues.

Previous Location Targeting Downfalls

One major complaint of advertisers was that there was no real “zip code” targeting available.  While you could (previously) enter zip codes within the geo-targeting settings in the AdWords interface, Google did not translate this into a true equivalent area if you uploaded them via bulk, and instead converted them into the accompanying city.  In order to get a more precise “zip code” geographic area (but still not the true exact zip area), locations had to be entered manually, which for those marketers using zip codes to target, resulted in a plethora of extra work.  This brought many advertisers to use Custom Shape targeting, by looking up the vicinity of the actual zip code, then essentially “drawing” a geo-targeted shape where the zip code(s) (or other geographic areas) were located.

Issues with the Updated Location Targeting Tool

Recently, Google changed their location targeting tool, which in the minds of many advertisers, only made many of the above issues worse.  Some previously offered options were phased out with the update, only multiplying certain problems.

  • Bulk Uploads: no longer does Google offer the option of essentially copying and pasting locations into the location targeting tool within the AdWords interface – yes, it’s gone altogether.  While Google may have good reason for this, all I can see are the negatives (and extra work) this is bringing upon campaign managers across the globe.  For all you advertisers out there who target a large amount of specific locations within your account, get ready to spend an incredibly large amount of time setting these locations.  While you still have the “option” of targeting to more than one location within your campaigns, each location needs to be added individually in the interface, or multiple locations can be chosen at once using the CTRL button within the Editor.
  • Zip Codes: while Google’s previous “solution” to zip code targeting left much to be desired, it’s now gone  altogether as an option.  If you have a list of zip codes that need to be targeted, those will have to be converted into cities, or entered as coordinates.  Although the old targeting tool didn’t offer the best zip code targeting options, at least it offered something.
  • Custom Shape Targeting: I’ve encountered many advertisers who have used this as a more precise solution to the previous zip code targeting, but it required a lot of extra work – looking up the shape of the zip code area itself and essentially “drawing” it as closely as possible within the AdWords interface.  It was also a great option for those marketers who didn’t want to necessarily target a specific country, city, state, region, etc. and instead saw success in more sporadic areas.  Custom Shape targeting was removed as an option in July of this year, and campaigns that already had custom shapes in place will only be able to maintain these settings until the end of this year.  Removal of this feature will cause advertisers to rely on other targeting options (that may not work as well for them), but the best option may be to target by radius, assuming you can obtain the coordinates necessary.  If you previously had custom shape targeting set up in any of your campaigns, you will now see the message “Feature removal planned” when viewing your campaigns’ location settings.  After 2011, your custom shapes will convert into available locations in AdWords or to a map point with a radius.

While Google’s new location targeting tool looks a lot sleeker and does offer some cool updates (‘Reach’ number, ‘Limited Reach’ messaging, and improved accuracy to name a few), the removal of many previous options will be leaving a lot of advertisers frustrated, and will result in additional time being spent on something that was previously done so quickly.  Maybe there’s a chance that Google will release a new and much improved location targeting tool in the near future (which would hopefully bring back the beloved bulk upload option), but until then, many advertisers will have to give their geo-targeting settings and strategies a facelift.

http://www.lunametrics.com/blog/2011/11/22/google-location-targeting-negatives/

5 Responses to “The Negatives of Google’s Changes to AdWords Location Targeting”

Dave says:

Your colleague, Jim Gianoglio, fortunately republished this piece in google+ and it grabbed my attention. I forgot about some of the changes and for a couple of campaigns, the change with regard to the custom shaped campaigns, which I will desperately miss.

I have some regional campaigns with clearly wierdly shaped target regions. Its been that way for years. As business operators we have known that. The custom shaped targeting simply confirmed it to a very large and very telling degree.

In time I ran some overlapping campaigns for targeted keyword phrases. I added custom shaped maps that more closely defined targeted regions that work for the business as opposed to larger/and looser radius regions.

It took a while for adwords to shift showing the targeted keywords from one campaign to the other. Once it did the results were telling and immeasurably better:

Higher CTR’s, lower costs, Better Information.

Let me repeat the last part because we take information and try and turn it into actions to create more effective results.

Better Information

Over time I’m seeing less clear information from Google: On the keyword side NOT PROVIDED grows in volume and percentage…and will continue to grow.

On the PPC side….now this effective tool is being withdrawn.

Ahhh….Google. All the information….all the search traffic. It is the 800 pound gorilla.

Brittany Baeslack Brittany Baeslack says:

Hi Dave,

Thanks for checking out the LunaMetrics blog! I’m sorry to hear that your campaigns will be among the many to be affected by the phasing out of custom shape targeting. You are right, it does seem as though we are seeing less clear information from Google as time goes on. Hopefully some of these geo-targeting changes will be revoked in the future.

Brittany

Ishtiaq says:

Brittany, I loved it the way you have explained, I was looking for this article only that what happened with previous adwords targeting methods such as custom shape targeting. Great you covered it nice and simple :)

amandaxx says:

You already know therefore considerably in the case of this subject, produced me individually imagine it from so many various angles. Its like men and women don’t seem to be interested except it’s something to accomplish with Lady gaga! Your own stuffs great. At all times take care of it up!

phone user 40%-60% each month off of what we are currently spending. That could be hundreds, even thousands of dollars rescued each and every calendar year.