3 Wishes for the Google+ Local Relocation Genie
When Google first made the announcement that they’d be transitioning Google Places into Google+ Local, I was pretty darn excited. I’d dipped my big toe in the local water not long before, helping businesses verify their Places listings at an internship and then publishing a still applicable guide to Google Places. I couldn’t help but think that Google+ held new and exciting opportunities for business owners looking to communicate with existing and prospective customers. All in a beautiful new interface, too. That was the cherry on top.
It’s been a fair amount of time since the transition now, and I’m still a fan of the switch. Having recently gone through the process of updating LunaMetrics’ location information via the Places (or + Local?) Dashboard, though, I thought it an appropriate time to voice my concerns with the whole relocation process. Without any further ado, my three wishes:
1. One Location
One of the challenges we faced (and continue to face) in the process of digitally relocating the LunaMetrics office was that of having multiple local listings show up in Google Search. While we don’t have a ton of visitors that need our NAP information on a regular basis, there have been circumstances wherein we’ve had to clarify our actual location to misled travelers.
Our old listing is marked as closed, of course, but you wouldn’t know that by looking at the SERPs. Thus, my first wish is for one definitive listing in the local results.
Update (March 25, 2013): A helpful individual from the Google Support team called our office last week to reconfirm that our old location is no longer valid. As of late last week, our old listing has disappeared from the search results – leaving only our new, valid location. While the reviews haven’t transferred over (yet?), this is a great start. My first wish has been granted. Thank you, Google.
2. Transferrable Reviews
Here’s another of the challenges that rears its ugly head when you relocate your business on Google+ Local. You get a new listing, sure; but what about all of those reviews you took so long to earn organically? They come along for the ride, right? Wrong. In fact, they stay right where they were. Suddenly, a brick and mortar business might be offering “absolutely amazing products” at a vacant location. That doesn’t seem right.
I know that this is a concern for a whole slew of business owners, and I think it’s something that Google’s local team should address sooner, rather than later. If I’m updating my location information via a verified account and then re-verifying the new location via that same account, where’s the risk in sending the reviews along with me?
3. Less Weird (More Personable) Support Calls
When local listing information is altered (or changes are recommended) via Google Map Maker or the Google+ Local page itself, one of Google’s practices seems to be to have someone call the business to independently verify the changes. I’m not in any way opposed to this; in fact, I think it’s a pretty good idea. With local, triangulation is a great thing.
Thus far, though, the experiences I’ve had speaking with these individuals have been incredibly odd. They’re trained to get answers to specific questions; I understand that. However, some things aren’t so cut-and-dried as the pre-defined business categories. It would be great to speak with someone who can deviate from the prompt and respond to legitimate questions related to your listings. This is my third wish.
Update (March 25, 2013): As I indicated in the first update, we did receive a call from a very personable Google representative not a week after this post went live. My third wish has been granted, too.
What are your thoughts on the Google+ Local business relocation process? How do you think it could be improved? Leave your thoughts in the comments below.